Essential VET Upgrade Needed to Train Celebrants for ALL Ceremonies
|
|
|
|
|
CoCA Celebrant News - Elected Officials |
|
|
March 2015 |
|
|
Hello Visitor,
We aim to keep Federal MPs and senators informed of our rapidly changing industry.
TOPIC: Better training for independent celebrants for all ceremonies
VET qualifications change all the time to adapt to new environmental and social conditions. Sometimes in response, legislation needs to change if the Regulations related to that sector are not "current industry standards".
An expert group of celebrant practitioners is recommending a Diploma in Celebrancy (an undergraduate VET qualification) in response to the changing needs of society.
The internet savvy younger generation as well as the seniors want less traditional yet meaningful ceremonies and rites of passage - life celebrations, funerals, memorials and more.
Our concerns
Currently Marriage Regulations require a Certificate IV in Celebrancy for Commonwealth Marriage Celebrants.
The Attorney-General’s Department (AGD) appears reluctant to change the Marriage Regulations to adopt a Diploma of Celebrancy as the industry standard for independent celebrants.
If the Regulations do not change, our industry cannot determine its own future and ensure prospective celebrants are well trained for changing community needs which is the goal of VET reviews.
We need your help:
MPs and Senators can ensure the Marriage Regulations
- support an undergraduate Diploma in Celebrancy
OR
- require a portion of this Diploma (at least equivalent of the current Certificate IV in Celebrancy)
as the industry standard for authorisation as a Commonwealth Marriage Celebrant
This is common practice for Regulators responsible for only a part of the worker's job role for many VET Training qualifications, and was used in 2002 when the AGD chose only a portion of a VET qualification for authorisation as a Commonwealth Marriage Celebrant.
Rationale:
If the Department does not wish to support higher qualifications to ensure better trained celebrants, the AGD can select a portion of this qualification for authorising new Marriage Celebrants.
The Marriage Act takes this position on the regulation of the Recognised Religious Celebrants and State Officers, making no statement as to the broader training needs of these celebrants, as marriage is only one aspect of their role in the community. Many Commonwealth celebrants also have a broader professional role than marriage.
More about Vocational Education Training (VET)
More about Marriage Related Issues
CoCA liaises with the Attorney-General's Department in Canberra on issues relating to Marriage Law and the Marriage Celebrancy Sector. If you need more information about this issue or information about our profession, please contact the CoCA Secretary.
Kind regards
Judy Brooks CoCA Secretary secretary@coalitionofcelebrantassociations.org.au Published by: Coalition of Celebrant Associations (CoCA) Incorporated ABN: 60 306 885 313 www.coalitionofcelebrantassociations.org.au
|
|
|
The Coalition of Celebrant Associations (CoCA) Inc is the peak body for celebrants in Australia. CoCA is an association of celebrant associations spanning the nation. One of CoCA's key roles is to represent Commonwealth marriage celebrants concerns, needs and suggestions to the Attorney-General and the Attorney-General's Department and through its Protocol with the Department to provide advice on the development, implementation and review of the Commonwealth Marriage Celebrant Program.
|
|
|
Disclaimer: This e-News is a publication under the auspices of the CoCA Inc. The ideas presented are not necessarily those of the editors nor of the CoCA Inc. delegates. The statements and opinions expressed in this publication are made in good faith for the development of civil celebrancy, and the CoCA Inc, editors, volunteers and contributors do not take any responsibility for those statements or opinions, any inferences that may be drawn from them, or actions or charges which may result from them. The Editor reserves the right not to print any item that is defamatory, or that is anonymously sent, and to edit any contributions as required. |
|
|
|